Saturday, June 15, 2024

The expiry of the petrodollar, and a simple person's analysis of the oceans being too hot

 

My first community contribution and introduction the other day ended with somewhat of a segue into this topic.


snapshot of Sea Surface Temp is 30.8° C / 87.4° by green dot; source: earth.nullschool.net

SST (Sea Surface Temperature) @ 27.56° N, 50.36° E was 31.4° Celsius yesterday

These are the heat maps that I monitor daily.

"The oceans being too hot" is a topic that traverses both sides of the global sphere, many disciplines, and it requires a calm and sober-minded analysis, not something proponents of the #petrodollar have been known for possessing.  As a writer on the Internet since 1995, I am well aware of the kinds of impatience non-scientific people have for facts and logic that goes contrary to their opinions of how the world should work. Those who made their retirement plans unaware that the petrodollar would lose its dominance this year may feel uncomfortable when reading this column.  It is not my intent to physically harm you. If you start to feel uncomfortable, remember you can come back and read more later. Maybe take a deep breath and go take a walk somewhere -- preferably somewhere with living (not plastic) plant life that you can talk to and participate in healthful oxygen.exchange. You're also welcome to go read something else that makes you more comfortable.  

If you are able to move and walk freely to the nearest greenspace unhindered by recent tornado, derecho and hail damage (MD, MN, IA, NE, MS, LA, TN, AR, KS, SD, TX, CO), flood waters (FL, MS, GA, LA, ND, TX, KY), Saharan dust storms (Algeria, Libya, and coming soon the the Caribbean), "raging out of control wildfires" (TX, AZ, WY, UT, WA, CA), or angry weapon-wielding military who have inconceivably obscured their entire human bodies with the wardrobe designed to keep the petrodollar "secure"?  Aside from rendering themselves unattractive and ridiculous looking, such confused people clearly do not understand what those wardrobes are really enabling -- hint: it has nothing to do with future security of humanity. After multiple decades of testing, it is clear that the wardrobe confused people put on to enable accelerated global warming does not actually secure "heart" of the country most invested in the petrodollar.  Quite the opposite, in fact.


Trinity River (TX) is currently in moderate flood stage at 28.6 feet. Major floodstage @ 29'

So if not the petrodollar, what? Moomoo readers would be familiar with alternatives to the petrodollar (note for translators: previous sentence was written specifically to say "alternatives" in the plural form, implying the existence of multiple financial "currencies"), including the much-undervalued petro৳, the petro¥, the petro港元, even the petro円 being in charge of assigning their own values to the word "petro". If you are interested in learning more about the history of this term -- why and how the petrodollar term came about -- this writeup from 2023 (RCT) by Caleb Hinton has some detail.  Keep in mind that the term today is expired; that is, the seemingly-limitless inflation that some hasty supposed "AI" toting stocks have enjoyed due to their favoritism of the petrodollar?  Such inflation is not sustainable at previous rates, as the climatology maps included with this column indicate.  Nobody is "winning" anything by overheating the ocean waters, resultant from too many vacation selfies on their favorite technology megacaps.

Today we focus on the present, current state of the global temperature map that mistakenly prioritized the petrodollar too long.   We'll do this with a S.W.O.O.P.  For visual thinkers and learners, I have included some digital art I made at some point during these last 4 years ... I made this with my own talents and skillset:


the jipji'ju'gisutnat is making a SWOOP gesture

SWOOP is a derivative of the often-referenced biz school term "SWOT" (an acronym about business plans; you can look it up). But unlike the SWOT, the SWOOP takes into consideration a more global perspective on the net effects of business plans.  Specifically does the SWOOP outline:

Strengths,

Weakness,

Opportunities to improve,

Outside stakeholders affected by the business plan -- always acknowledging that they have rights and sovereignty to refuse any partnerships or proposals offered -- the rights to make their own decisions,

Precision -- this one can be refined for translators to communicate there must be some non-biased metrics and a realistic learning cycle to assess:

"What needs improved?" 

"How can we DOWNSIZE outrageous expectations -- such as a 3 TRILLION #PETRODOLLAR marketcap -- on non-essential datacenter/computer part: the GPU?"

Precisely, how can we downsize those expectations to save more beautiful and diverse species from the irrational inflation of the petrodollar as we prepare humanity for a more realistic currency standard and future??  

We'll undertake this SWOOP with fearlessness in pointing out weaknesses and admitting mistakes. The "Strengths" category we'll do last, as it is usually derived from the other 4.  It is not correct to start with the "strengths" of the petrodollar. To assist those who might be having a hard time with this column, we shall break the topics down into ... what will probably be n/5 sections, one for each letter of the SWOOP.

PRECISELY:  Now about the expiry of the petrodollar

Let's work backwards on our SWOOP, starting precisely with "Precision."  Specifically precision about time frames between integrated learning cycles. If you are one of those readers who had to go take a walk to calm down your fears about losing the appearance of "winning" something with your stock portfolio being heavily weighted in petrodollars?  I hope you are feeling better now.  Take another deep breath as you read the next paragraph.

On June 9 of this year, a decades-old agreement between what some maps call "Saudi Arabia" and what some maps call "The United States of America" expired and was intentionally not renewed to favor the financial denomination of the petrodollar. Creating a cut-off for inflation was a wise move on the part of the original entities, whose original goals were (and remain) rightful sovereignty over their own natural resources.  As the jipji'ju'gisutnat will tell you plainly: a body moving through space, unhindered, wishes to continue to move through space unhindered. There are literal physics formulas that prove this motion.  In our SWOOP, let us focus now on the "Precision" part on the time frame.

Things the humans used the petrodollar to make -- like wars over artificial borders, military checkpoints, border patrols, and "maximum security" prisons around innocent people like Lakȟótiyapi language keeper Leonard Peltier?  These are not natural and hinder the most efficient use of oxygen.exchange.  Imagine yourself in his place -- locked off from the world for nearly 50 years because two agents in the FBI were bored enough to go investigate some missing "cowboy boots" only one year after the "petrodollar" started being the incorrect replacement for the "gold standard".  Dozens of testimonies proclaim his innocence, and -- because it is relevant to any story involving cowboy boots -- remember that cows are not even endemic / native / indigenous to North America! As you take another deep breath and rationally consider cause and effect -- do you also agree that the non-native methane-producing excess of cows on "ranches" in Texas is also certainly attributable to the 30.7 degree SST off what some maps call "Texas"?


What some maps call "Texas" in not immune from anomalistic sea surface temperatures.

While I am  unsure how many ranchers might be reading Moomoo Financial, it is important for the aspect of "Precision" that we note it is not correct to assume that they (or you) are "winning" anything by forcing petrodollar-centric dramas on regions the North American native tribes (inclusive of the Lakota) have managed "just fine" for over 10K years.  Before petrodollar-centric dramas came along, bison grazed the plains like a salad bar, and no fences, ranchers, or "border patrols" hindered them.  Indeed, witnesses from all over the global sphere will assure you that 御婆さん Uŋčí Makhá was successfully implementing oxygen.exchange with native life for hundreds of millions of years before humans demanded to see how she reacts to the petrodollar.

As we wrap up this column, do meditate on the original design -- that every geological system has an accompanying biosphere of endemic species that needs them (inclusive of indigenous language keepers like Leonard Peltier) strong and healthy.

n ~=1  ;  n/5

(TBC @ 1353 words)

Friday, November 6, 2020

Everything too radical for academia, and the problem of diminishing attention spans


 

 

> enter(fusion)

> mode(summary)

> ref(radical_528)

 

 arapahoe.tech.prog[aux]

import /opt/ntv.lang 

Courtesy "EN" documentation for people who still don't understand that "EN" is not my ntv.lang

Academia is too verbose. Too easy to lose the spirit of decolonization {some variety.ref among prepositional phrases} all the Euro-centric and colonial-specific historic details that "ivy league" and their aspiring counterparts slam down in the book sellers. Is the equivalent of drowning in irrelevant and largely-useless data.  We don't need any more angles from the white man.   

Decolonizing requires the human go back further to/on their home continent where their great great great great great great ancestors ruins have stories unique to them, ones indigenous folks here are not necessarily interested in today. Especially and including the noise pollution of politics! 

Justice for the oldest peoples on Turtle Island has been in the queue the longest.  Our clan mother-based Supreme Court will always outrule anything the sleazy "US Supreme Court" might say.  All of the translations reached the same conclusion: there's no honor in that court.

Three hundred sixty-three revolutions ago, there were no English names on the back of Turtle Island. Nobody wanted or needed Greco-Roman anything, and the greed of Italian accountants was only beginning to become apparent to the European masses. This is a story rooted in fact, not fiction:

https://ecosteader.com/@indie/103861317639897787

 

 

 

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Tri-level logosmography for data and financial auditing.

Logismography as a concept has been derived from a storied historical past.
In one of my graduate-level management accounting classes, the lore was of a system more advanced and informative than double-entry bookkeeping. This mythical entity was a system that used a method of triple entry accounting, called Logismography. At one point several years ago, I even checked Wikipedia; there was no entry for this idea. There is still no entry for this idea.
No results for articles containing the term, either.

Okay, well what about the most authoritative authority on the attribution of authors? That's right... I'm talking about our good friend, Google.
Top-level skim yields nothing significant. What about peeking into the mountain of student-funded research[3] available to students and professors whist they are ensconced in the Ivory towers? Why yes; I'm referring to greedy database hoarders like EBSCO host and JSTOR that continue to squelch access to the actual research part of student and taxpayer-funded research.
But we digress. Back to this
For what this system might be used, the authors could only speculate. Today, after about a decade of "in the field professional experience", I have some ideas.

Logismography was thought to have been developed in Renaissance times, and later generations of accountants dismissed it as being "unviable", preferring the double entry version developed by Pacioli. Given that the physical limitations of his time didn't include the computational or cryptographical boundaries that we enjoy today, would a Logismography-like system be a natural and obvious choice for present day?



(Footnote): Patent possibly pending.

  • [1] Ancient Double-Entry Bookkeeping. Scholars' Book Co. 1974: p 33.
  • [2] Filios, Vassilios P. "Four Schools of European Accounting Thought." The Accounting Historians Journal (1981): pp 61-78.
  • [3] http://tech.mit.edu/V132/N61/swartz.html
  • [4] https://web.archive.org/web/20161008012416/http://transparentaccounting.org/
  • Monday, September 17, 2018

    Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) smells like Enron

    Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) smells like Enron

    The most egregious accounting fraud, insider trading, and ENRON-like practices are perpetuating at Salesforce, where they're cooking the books


    It's open season for looting on Wall Street. The regulators, it seems, have put on their blinders. For a holder of a hard-earned Baccalaureate degree in Accountancy and a staunch promoter and maintainer professional accounting ethics, it's sickening. The warning sirens are screaming but nobody is listening. Although I could never do the wardrobe of an auditor CPA, I can still share my findings....

    One of the worst offenders is headquartered in downtown San Francisco, in a lofty tower stuffed full of headset-wearing marketing people and "engineers"  tucked in with a splattering of corporate motivational posters.

    The corporation for which these lipsticked pigs work does not produce anything tangible; it does not have any saleable inventory. This corporation didn't invent anything noteworthy; nor does it hold any significant patents. It doesn't contribute anything of appreciable value to its customers.  

    If, on December 30, 2016, you'd looked at the income statement of this corporation, you'd wonder how on Earth did it get to a 46.9 Billion dollar market cap? (Yes, that is billion with a "B"; 46 billion +900 million).

    You'd be baffled, and perhaps dig a bit into the balance sheet and quarterlies. In them, you would discover what are factually negative GAAP Earnings-Per-Share (EPS) for all seven out of seven of the last seven years since it IPO'd (2009 - 2016). In fact, you'd see a company that has largely been inventing its own "earnings" and selling those fake numbers to shareholders.  The numbers which do not adhere to any accounting standards, they say, are an indication of their "growth".  Growing what, exactly?  You'd see a company with vague business model and poor-to-mediocre digital products haphazardly glued together with wads and wads of cold and limp spaghetti.  You might try a few random searches to see what the big deal is... how has this company managed to stay in business? What are they selling, exactly?

    What you'd discover instead of answers is droves and droves of pigs: pigs that are singing and tap-dancing incessantly about the cold spaghetti. There are literally thousands of troll accounts on social media sites, all of them incessantly praising this company. You might wonder what the hell was going on.  How does a company that can't explain what it does in one clear sentence have so many fanboys?  And why are there so many tactics being used to promote Salesforce so similar to what we saw with the Russian troll farm accounts used to steal our elections?

    Then maybe you'd decide to take a listen to a conference call hosted by the chief pig himself -- Marc Benioff.  Just one listen and it becomes clear that this is company is nothing more than spew of mouthful after mouthful of slobbering and regurgitated pie-in-the-sky lies. Benioff & Co. assault the listener with an irrational barrage of buzzwords about digital apps, the "cloud" growth, customer-facing solutions and blah, blah blah.  The detachment from reality is quite alarming.

    For any real software engineer, it's too much to swallow.  Real hackers know that you CANNOT scale customized spaghetti. Adding more spaghetti on top of others' forgotten and moldy spaghetti doesn't make the spaghetti any more efficient.  Benioff's delusions about growth have zero substance, like marshmallow fluff whipped up with green olive baloney puked on top of that cold spaghetti.

    Are you getting sick yet?  If not, you should be.  This is not right.   

    These days, society is so well-acquainted with delusional men that it lets them get away with way more than it should. Sometimes society even likes to encourage them by lapping up their vomit.

    Fast forward to today.  A mere 21 months later, and that Salesforce vomit is now being "valued" by shareholders at an astounding 115.58 billion dollar market cap.  It has increased in value by 69.5 Billion dollars in only 21 months.
        


    Let me spell that out for you. The ACCOUNTING FRAUD at SALESFORCE has stolen over 115 billion, 580 million from investors who believed the fake numbers Benioff and Co have been selling as "real" GAAP numbers!

    For some other perspective, consider the breakdown of what the best analysts on Wall Street make out in difference between "small" cap and "large" cap stock.  The journey between a small and large cap ($10B of value) is long and arduous, and here is key:  It takes a long time.  It takes a long time of solid earnings that produce positive EPS, not on the back of "bridge loans" for billions and other shady deals derived from other co-conspirators who profit from borrowed money inflated like a blimp.

    What this means is that when the fraud and corrupt accounting practices are exposed, all of the Salesforce "insiders" will have effectively stolen over 100 billion dollars.   It's being reported that Benioff is going to buy Time Magazine with his booty. 

    This ALSO means Marc Benioff's attempt to acquire TIME Magazine for $190M is being done with Unlawful Proceeds from Stock Sale!

    Why?

    It's easier to fake the short-term than it is the long term.

    • Egregious balance sheet manipulation  --  Even Tesla, which everybody knows is maybe probably prematurely overvalued, doesn't try to defraud people with fake Goodwill or "Intangible" assets. 

      For a peek as to how the insiders "really" feel about their growth, take a look at insider dumping (NOTE: this does not include 3 of the most egregious dumps in the last 4 weeks)

      Insider dumping

    How?

    Factual GAAP accounting numbers are being suppressed, and instead the salesmen direct investors to the fraudulent and manipulated non-GAAP earnings they repeat ad nauseum.

    Since most of what Salesforce can claim as its revenue comes from unenforcable "contracts" (prepay forward contracts are fully refundable by law!) and which it has not yet delivered (and for which no real engineers will work), it has been emulating tactics used by ENRON insiders to mislead investors about growth.  Like ENRON, Salesforce has a fishy credit rating with one of its most intimate bed mates, including Merril Lynch, the company that fronted $3 billion of the $6.5 billion acquisition cost for Mulesoft.   
    • Borrowing practices parallel those used by ENRON 
    Enron entered into circular transactions that were characterized as prepay forward contracts in order to disguise borrowings as cash from operations. Lay was aware of the importance and magnitude of prepay transactions to create operating cash flow and thereby maintain Enron's investment grade credit rating. Lay was aware that the credit rating agencies were not told the magnitude of Enron's prepay obligations and that this information was not disclosed in Enron's public filings.1   

    In Conclusion...



    You shouldn't need a CPA's wardrobe to catch this kind of crime.  It's wrong on every level: it diverts dollars from investment in truly worthy companies, for one.  It enables sleazebags like Benioff to cash out hundreds of millions of dollars, for two.  It makes places like San Francisco even worse than it already is.



    PLEASE write to the SEC and tell them time to start jailing criminals like Marc Benioff and Keith Block; this kind of fraud will ruin America; criminals and enablers doing this stuff on purpose need to be locked up and throw away the key.




    1. https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-94.htm
      


    Saturday, March 24, 2018

    CLOUD Act: "Corruption Leaks On USA Datacenters"

    Update 2021: DELETE ALL MILITARY SPENDING.  THIS IS NOT SANE AND SAME THING DIFFERENT RCT.  

    DISALLOW FOREVER.

     

    CLOUD Act:  "Corruption Leaks On USA Datacenters" 

    This will come back to bite you in the ass, Republiscams

    Whenever a group or entity attempts to fly under the radar to enact rules and restrictions that bind others while extracting themselves from legal repercussions, my intuitive hackles go off.  Big time.

    What on Earth is this odd piece of legislation doing, and why was it sneaked into the spendy-spendy spending bill with absolutely no citizen input?

    That is exactly what happened, though, when Congress hurredly passed legislation that included "DIVISION V -- CLOUD ACT".

    It never received a hearing. It was robbed of a stand-alone floor vote because Congressional leadership decided, behind closed doors, to attach this un-vetted, unrelated data bill to the $1.3 trillion government spending bill.

    The bill originated with one of the most corrupt of the corrupt politicians, Orrin Hatch.  Orrin is evil and corrupt because all throughout his career, he's done nothing but endorse and ensure the torture of Mother Earth.  Devoid of integrity and selfish beyond belief, he has sought only to protect only his own incumbency, choosing party over Country time and time again.  Along with his comrades from the state operating more criminally-negligent corporations than any other in the US, his "holier than thou" religious nutbags think it is their "right" to rape the world of its beauty, to trash her soil, and to poison her air ... all in the name of Capitalism.

    But back to this bill.

    See page 2201 of the 2232-page spending bill: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vTp-DOU9fbImz1YnRaKPEAeRtMAi8pUu/view?usp=sharing

    In reading the text of this bill, it becomes obvious pretty quickly that they want us to believe that the point of this law is to "[Clarify] the Legal Use of Overseas Data".  It would be easy enough to fall into this trap ; it seems well-intentioned enough.  

    Unfortunately, that is not what it does.  At all.  That is not what they want it to do at all.  They are in full panic mode, attempting to hide and cover up their attacks on environmentally-minded US (or aspiring to be US) citizens, and on the US democratic process itself.  They want this law to obfuscate the definition of what is "legal" where it benefits them in some places (by using the word "Overseas"), and to remove criminal penalties from what would otherwise be US jurisdiction in others (by imposing private-citizen protections on corporate entities).

    Corporations and associations should NEVER be granted the protections of private citizens.  Never ever ever ever.  Furthermore, all officials working in the public sector -- especially those with "private citizen business" on the side -- should not be provided protections from their criminal activities (financial fraud, tax evasion, conspiracy to defraud the US of its land trust, etc) or from the penalties of those crimes. 

    And yet, that is exactly what they are trying to do here. Notice the interesting word choice of "Overseas"? How ridiculous that is in a world that is already digitally connected!

    The obfuscation here is that by convincing people there are unknown and "possibly" malicious actors in a hazy and ill-defined place "Overseas", the private-businesses-minded "Government" should be granted rights that allow it to cover up whatever crimes it deems need covered up, especially those crimes perpetrated by the executive branch of power.

    Indeed, the goal of the senators and representatives under Trump's thumb -- as is the goal of most corrupt persons -- is to extract themselves from legal repercussions of their criminal activities.  They are fully aware of, and fearful of being accountable after they've already broken laws or betrayed their ethics.  There's proof out there, somewhere, that they broke the law or violated promises to constituents.  Maybe somebody is blackmailing them.  They know they'll be caught sometime... when they will be caught is the big question.  If they try and hurry up to make it "illegal" to use that data against them, they erroneously reason that they can't be caught or punished.

    The motto of the most corrupt people is that as long as it's not "illegal" it can't be "unethical", right?

    Wrong.

    Sorry Republiscams; that is not how it works.  Let's interpret a few key pieces of text from this bill to reveal your corruption in those underlying motivations for changing the laws:

    Such efforts by the United States Government are being impeded by the inability to access data stored outside the United States that is in the custody, control, or possession of communications-service providers that are subject to jurisdiction of the United States.

    can be interpreted to mean:

    "Now that the Republicans are in power, it's important that we wipe all evidence of our knowledge of, and cooperation with the Kremlin who helped us rig the election that put Trump in the White House.  We want our "official" guys to see what you have on us and let us decide if it should be legal or not to have that.  We must also be able to buy Get Out Of Jail Free cards for members of our party who have committed financial crimes and/or crimes against the Earth; likewise, we want to get more dirt on our rivals in the Democratic party and use that to distract the public.  We need access to our rivals' private lives where it competes with our interests, and we're going to make this here law make makes you do just that."

    Next let's examine the Republican's use of "associations" to bloat their power and to circumvent the laws that are meant to protect individual persons, not corporations.

    § 2523.  ... the term ‘United States person’ means a citizen or national of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, an unincorporated association a substantial number of members of which are citizens of the United States or aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or a corporation that is incorporated in the United States. 

    Let's break this down.  They are trying to define a "person" as each one of these things :
    1) human person born in the US (citizen)
    2) human person not born in the US with permanent residence status
    3) US association (e.g. National Rifle Association, National Association of Realtors)
    4) US corporation

    And to then say that each of these "persons" should be granted private-citizen protections!  What a grotesque distortion of the intent of the law.  Indeed, this is not at all what civil liberties are about.

    A citizen on her own is inherently less able to defend herself against a corrupt government (and against the corruption of associations and corporations!). Why would the law want to extend protections meant for private citizens' to public corporations and associations? 

    There is only one possible answer.  

    Proof of corruption will be (or has been) migrated to datacenters in countries with the least amount of regulation.  With this "proof" in their LANs, those countries are ripe for their own potential entanglement of corruption.   As the Republicans' dream is to corrupt the entire world with monstrous dictators like Donald Trump, they hope this CLOUD Act will scare more people than it will empower. 

    Just as EVIL COMPANIES operate "shell corporations" out of the Cayman Islands to obfuscate and hide the source and movement of their billionaire private-citizens financial data, so too was this bill written to favor protections of the already-powerful at the expense of the low and humble citizens.

    Datacenter admins from Planet Earth, this is your opportunity to choose to do good.  Let this bill come back to bite all of the bad guys in the ass: if you know of useful information on corrupt Earth-raping associations, corporations, or governments, you should absolutely share them outside your LAN.  Let us all make backups, and backups of backups such that there will be no doubt that the voice of the ecologically-minded citizens who are speaking up and out against the rape of Mother Earth... let there be no doubt that their voices will be heard.    



    Friday, November 25, 2016

    Required Reading for the President Elect

    Dear President Elect:

    Congratulations on your success in the election. As you have seen and can bear witness, the tools of Democracy that built the United States of America into the already great country it is... these tools DO still work as they were designed to work. We hope you understand that any further invective regarding Democracy being "rigged" will absolutely not be tolerated;  your words were insulting to the service men and women who have shown, through their actions, that they believe in U.S. Democracy. We hope your actions will demonstrate respect and honor for their service.

    The architects of the documents known as the Constitution thought this "Developing the Future of a Continent" thing through pretty darn well.  The Electoral College is a facet that they specifically engineered within these documents to distribute weight of voting power more evenly among rural and urbanized states.  That the American people, as a whole, demonstrated the power of the Electoral College this election cycle is indeed momentous.

    In fact, this is why I write today.  Because your understanding of ecosystems will be key to your success -- or failure -- as a President.   

    Ecosystems are entities that provide life, nourishment, and sustenance to multiple generations of inhabitants.  Indeed, there is no human power and there are no human efforts that can match the efficiency inherent in a natural ecosystem.  Many Americans consider sustenance-producing ecosystems to be a gift from God. Others simply respect the fact that ecosystems have been producing sustenance for humans for thousands of years, allowing certain individuals to thrive under certain conditions.  What those conditions are, exactly, only the architect in nature understands.  The constant is the gentle reminder that operations within and among those individuals in an ecosystem are very delicate and easily damaged by recklessness.  Do you understand that recklessness creates damage, Mr. President Elect?  

    Now let's talk about your Proposed Contract. There are some great ideas in here, and there are some ideas that need work. It isn't that bad for a first draft, and you definitely deserve a +5 for creativity.  Before getting too carried away, however, it seems there are a few history lessons you may have forgotten. Lessons, specifically, regarding the legacy of our Public Lands.

    Reading Requirement:  Brush up on History.  


    Your new job comes with a temporary stay at the White House, and you will have the opportunity to listen to and implement some ideas from an often-ignored and frequently unheard slice of America. As such, your first assignment from them is to read this collection of essays.  Numerous authors and numerous citations to important historical events transcribed to National Archives are documented within in this book, From Conquest to Conservation: Our Public Lands Legacy

    It is a non-political, facts-heavy book with some additional narratives from individuals who've lived in and cared for land and people and creatures on the fringes of modern society.  Our Public Lands are areas that your Presidential predecessors and the American people as a whole have chosen to preserve for very specific reasons: Economic reasons that have nothing to do with money. Ecological reasons that have everything to do with clean water, breatheable air, healthy fish, and abundant wildlife.  Logical reasons that that nobody with a real estate license will ever be privileged enough to  know.  Spiritual reasons, for nature as a healing power.  Legacy reasons only future generations will be able comprehend and understand.
     
    The vast majority of people who voted for you are people who hail from the antithesis of NYC. They are a very different kind of person from what you are used to wheeling and dealing for the latest gold-plated tower in the latest trendy big city.  They are also very different from the kind of penthouse-renting person you typically cater to.  Surely you will need to familiarize yourself with the kind of person who just doesn't understand extravagance.  This book will allow you to do so... it presents Rural Americans' opinions from both sides of the aisle, and it outlines in very clear and certain terms things that you must understand if you are to be a successful President.

    People who value the heritage of the land do not value exploitation of land.  They care about economics and "jobs", but not the the point it infringes on their way of life.  They care about building new and better structures and infrastructure, but not the the point it will infringe on the way of life for their children or grandchildren.   This seems almost counter-intuitive but it simply means that it does NOT involve breaking out the bulldozers and cranes without FIRST taking some serious environmental assessments.    

    First and foremost you must understand:  Residents and respecters of rural America do not want swaths of pop-up housing "For Rent".  They build it, they own it.  The development that will take place in these fringes of America must be done without greedy Realtor companies involved at all.  This will surely upset a great deal of your fellow politicians whose going-concern is tied up in bribes they've taken from the Realtors... but do not be swayed by their delusions.  The truth is that Rural America despises lobbyists.  They despise anybody out to exploit the equity of their land. Since you, Mr. President Elect, are someone whose entire personal wealth has come from exploiting people, we don't expect you to understand.  So here's the explanation:

    "Exploitation" has taken and can take many forms: over-plundering natural resources, like coal (leaving residents susceptible to environmental disasters like landslides), toxic waste, illegal dumping, destroying the water table, and more.  

    Development does not have to be destructive.  There are ways to plan for development and to implement those plans in a way that optimizes the right balance of economical and ecological objectives.  

    As a final friendly warning, please do not be hoodwinked into thinking that the voice of Rural America comes from people like the Ammon Bundy Occupants. That mutation of delusional individuals is a group of terrorists who do not represent the heart or soul of Rural America; quite the opposite, in fact.  When the land dictates, through climate and vegetation, that it is not conducive to grazing cows, respecters of the ecosystem do not graze cows.  Nor they do not throw tantrums and wield guns on property consecrated for preservation of ecosystems when land doesn't happen to be conducive to grazing cows.

    Land stewardship is frequently about simply leaving places alone, refusing to put a price tag on the cost of disrupting that land for human use when other species can make better use of the land than humans can.   Because our sustenance as humans will always be tied up with the sustenance of other species.  

    There is a documentary called A River Between Us that everybody, including you, should watch in order to understand some of the things that are at stake here.   The people who were on this continent before the ships with white ancestors sailed... they have many more generations of observation and wisdom to share regarding these ecosystems that we all must share... Many of us have already conceded to their greater wisdom, and to their understanding of the interconnectedness of water and sky and land to sustain us.  It's not about sacrificing one for the other; it's about practicing restraint with respect.

    I'll leave you with these final thoughts.

    “Here is your country. Cherish these natural wonders, cherish the natural resources, cherish the history and romance as a sacred heritage, for your children and your children's children. Do not let selfish men or greedy interests skin your country of its beauty, its riches or its romance.” ― Theodore Roosevelt





    Sunday, April 3, 2016

    Exposing Fraud at a California POA

    This letter was sent to the CA State Board of Equalization

    Dear Board:

    Please open an investigation into an entity known as Association Management Services and its registered agent, Nicholas Mitchell. I've gathered some evidence that points to an overwhelmingly obvious situation of tax fraud, embezzlement, and misappropriation of funds happening at a POA I accidentally became a member of when buying a lot from a county tax sale.

    Background: When I bought a small parcel in a way-out-in-the-boonies place in 2014, I paid all the back/overdue taxes on it to Siskiyou County and was thus deeded title to the land. However. Shortly thereafter, I suddenly found myself assaulted with demands for POA payments (POA fees going back to 2013) from an entity known as "Association Management Services", operating from PO Box 307 in Weed, CA.

    Aside from the fact I didn't know that by buying land I'd be bullied into paying some company annual dues and fees on the land I already have legal title to (Siskiyou County did not disclose this information to me when I purchased the lot), something just seemed off about the original invoice he sent me in 2014.  A $50 "transfer fee" tacked on...  POA fees being racked up before title is even legally transferred... other weirdness.

    A small bit of research, and I discover something odd... this "company" demanding payment is actually just one person: one person named Nicholas Mitchell. I was not able to determine the legal organization of his business entity “Association Management Services,” in order to determine how to file complaints for invoicing mistakes; but my research did uncover many interesting things. Things that, when taken all together, point to not only misappropriation of funds, but also almost certainly, mail fraud and tax fraud.

    Nicholas Mitchell is the Registered Agent of Association Management Services … however, he's also the registered agent of MSPOA, Inc. (source), and at LEAST two other HOAs.


    This seems like a lot of HOAs and POAs to "manage," doesn't it? Mt. Shasta Vista alone describes itself as: "Some 1,640 far flung, mostly juniper and sage parcels averaging 2.5 acres each." So if we look at MSVPOA and Siskiyou Highlands Property Owners Association and Timberline Court Homeowners Association, there's something that doesn't sit quite right in terms of magnitude and ability to manage when you're just one person. My intuitive hackles detected a probable pattern of abuse and fraud at a rather large scale.... I bet his Realtor(TM) buddies are involved somehow...

    143 Main Street vs PO Box 307 Weed, CA 96094

    Mitchell is clearly trying to be a "smart" criminal. He's registered various business entities (listed below) to cover his tracks; some show up as a physical address and some show up as the PO Box.  All of them seem to operate – in one way or another -- out of a real estate agency. So let's look at all of these businesses in the context that he "manages" them, such that they can feed each other, maximizing his ability to embezzle ... "cooking the books" to minimize actual expense while maximizing reported expense.

    NOTE: website URLs can be accessed on my website link @ end of letter.

    (1)  "Mount Shasta Vista Property Owners Association"
    File Number:    C0495803

    (2) "Siskiyou Lake Highlands" POA, Inc.
    File Number:      C1848778   

    (3)  "Timberline Court Homeowners Association"
    File Number:    C1930623

    (4) "Elite Real Estate Group" Specializes in creating foreclosures, marketing foreclosures, collecting fees on foreclosed parcels/properties when they are resold or rented.  This company stands to benefit immensely if Mitchell's proposal to enact aggressive "foreclose" on POA fees in arrears gets passed.   (we're not going to link to this website from here, but it is "Get My Home Now . com" (without spaces))

    (5) "Association Management Services"   The shadiest of them all in terms of legal entity, this appears to be Nicholas Mitchell's personal consulting business, how he collects his "salary" from MSVPOA?   

    (6)  "Rental Management Services"  source    2 employees, eh?

    (7) "Alpine Association Management"  (source (8) The "Wooly Sheep Inc" (source #1, source #2)  Not sure what this is... but if it's attached to PO Box 307, it is a definite IRS flag.

    (9) "Siskiyou Lake Highlands Mutual Water Co" (source #1, source #2).

    (10)  "Siskiyou Lake Highlands Property Owners Association" (source).

    Yes. That's 10.

    As I am sure your office is aware: "Post Office Expenses" are such a common tax deduction for businesses that most auditors wouldn't think twice about them being legitimate. However, given this setup, it's clear that there is only one P.O. Box funnelling numerous legal entities. One address for rent and lease expenses, too… are each of these POAs responsible for 1/10th of the agency's ACTUAL expense, or are all of the POA members being told theirs is the only “Association” being managed, and thus requiring full bill being footed by each of them?

    Many times have I requested the financial statements of the POA I paid dues to to check the numbers myself; however at this point, Nick Mitchell is completely ignoring my communications.  

    (As a heads up, I have been quite vocal in my discoveries (posting them on by blog) during my numerous attempts to get my concerns resolved… so I am slightly worried this might have given Nick Mitchell and his Realtor buddies time to destroy evidence, shuffle funds, fabricate receipts, etc. I am writing your office as a last resort).

    In any case, it's clear that he is mixing up all these legal entities in one PO Box, that means there should be just exactly one PO Box bill being paid to our most wonderful United States Postal Service.  This also means that whatever "Postal Expense" is recorded on the legal books of each of these 10 entities (some of which are supposed non-profits) is indeed NOT TRACEABLE and is thus being FALSIFIED in records to the cities, states, and federal government --- to both the public and to members. Fraud indeed. Little markers that point to putrid, rotten corruption.

    I am also concerned with his role in spreading misinformation regarding his inability to be “fired” when communicating with property owners.  

    According to what they are touting to members Nick Mitchell has "bulletproof" job security… (NOTE: this information is not deemed factual; it is simply information MSPOA, Inc. wants parcel owners to believe; it is available on  here the ~33rd paragraph.) :
    If we ever folded, the Association would not only face the ignominy of having failed to work together to preserve over 1500 parcel owners’ common interests, but have insult added to injury by paying some disinterested professional — often a bill-by-the-hour attorney, bankruptcy trustee or accountant — to take over current volunteer board decisions that could leave members voiceless in home front matters now taken for granted. All in addition to the salary already paid our professional manager, who’d stay on.
    This is so wrong it should be criminal... the association folds, but he gets to keep his salary AND gets to decide which one of his Real Estate buddies will "profit" from the association folding? Or even  threatening to fold, as the case may be?

    Is it coincidence that the REALTOR agency he works at specializes in the footwork needed to start foreclosing properties? There are plenty of people out there who make a buck on threats alone. How often does your office audit real estate companies that do this kind of terrible thing?

    Clearly Nick Mitchell the "consultant" is abusing whatever power of attorney he has, using FUD to promote his and his cronies' highly unethical agenda which includes:   
    • Imposing (what may be illegal) transfer fees that benefit no one but him and his companies, personally
    • Accelerating the pace at which properties can be "foreclosed" upon for lack of paying these fees (which appear to start accumulating before a parcel owner even has legal title)... snowballing them before a parcel owner even has a chance to be aware they exist.
    • Aggressively adding collection costs to a parcel owner's invoice at random intervals -- possibly dependent upon how much vengeance he has toward an individual entity.  He clearly does not like me and all my questions.
    • Deliberately denying parcel owners a neutral channel of grievance for his (and his company's) invoicing mistakes or intentional inflations. 
    • Continually refusing to provide clear and open book accounting to the parcel owners regarding use of their fees and funds.
    • Probable mail fraud and tax fraud.
    • Misrepresenting real estate expenses across multiple legal entities (only a gut feeling since I've been unable to audit the financial statements myself)
    As a final note, regarding my latest invoice from Nick Mitchell's "Association Management Services"... I moved in October of last year, and paid for mail forwarding.  However, I never received these invoices they are claiming I was sent. I am certain they were not sent.

    Last year at the members' meeting, the manager had a "brilliant idea” to help the association.. that plan is to start aggressively "foreclosing" on parcels, adding a weekly fee to parcel owners who have overdue invoices.  Absolutely disgusting. 

    Real estate agents are by far the most sleazy, maleficence-intentioned people in existence. There seems to be no despicable thing they won't do to extort a few thousand dollars here and a few more there... it adds up so quickly. In my observation, REALTORS and their agents are by far the most deliberately tax-evading “professionals”, continually abusing the spirit of the law.  It is criminal what they do, gleefully marking up their "services" beyond what is fair and reasonable, forcing people to take out bigger loans to give them lump sum payments. 

    Yet somehow, some way, they continually manage to pervert the system... over and over and over again.  This is wrong. I'm petitioning for MAXIMUM JAIL TIME for Nicholas Mitchell and for each and every individual who conspiring as part of his criminal scheme to defraud landowners. 
      


    Sincerely,
    L.S. Cook, MBA




    Note:  Comments on this story disabled.  To participate in the discussion or to learn how to take action as a citizen taxpayer, POA, or litigant in a class action suit, please see:  https://groups.google.com/d/forum/mt-shasta-vista  which is where we're collecting facts, research and sources.  If you know of other POAs implementing similar schemes, please follow a similar path:  gather evidence, find others victimized in the similar way and report the facts when you contact the Attorney General or the tax fraud reporting entity of your state.

    Thursday, July 30, 2015

    Fennica escorted out of Portland




    Today was a day for the books, at least in terms of environmental activism.  The Fennica, an icebreaker employed by Shell Oil, received a police and coast guard escort as it exited the Port of Portland early Thursday evening.

    A police and coast-guard escort

    Protesters from Greenpeace who'd dangled suspended from mountaineering equipment under the St. John's Bridge ~40 hours or so prior to this escort were ready to attempt to slow down this boat's as it was in a hurry. 

    Three of the 13 dangling protesters were forcibly removed from the bridge, so this boat could go underneath, and make its way back to the Arctic, where it will stand by in case one of the cap stacks blows a gasket.
      
    Fennica got an escort because it was in a hurry, and under a deadline.  Yup.  Break out the big guns in law enforcement to ensure that corporate interests get where they're needing to go, when they need to get there.

    Atrocious.

     

     


     


    Tuesday, March 17, 2015

    KwikPay and RenWeb -- Nelnet's malware exploits the student loan industry

    Was your student loan debt acquired illegally?  How malicious is KwikPay?  The $133 Billion Dollar Questions...


    If your student loan balance is going nowhere, and if you use or have been enticed by your loan "servicer" to use a little piece of software called KwikPay -- you may wish to read ahead.  Especially if your intentions are to minimize the actual dollar amount of interest (or interest + principle) paid. 

    See:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/04/cfpb-student-loan-payment_n_4726052.html

    Background: doing a little research on something only tangentially related to student loans, I happened across a couple intriguing posts on reddit... have a read  here, here and here.  Immediately my intuitive hackles went up:  something is not right.  And thus the "little" research led to more research, and some pretty interesting discoveries. 

    First and foremost: be informed that any company that uses KwikPay or Renweb is, in some way, affiliated with Nelnet.  This is not good thing.   

    Nelnet, AKA "National Education Loan Network, Inc." is a behemoth publicly-traded, for-profit company that operates under a vast number of names and pseudonyms.  Nelnet operates at least 47 subsidiaries (probably more today; but as of 2008 there were at least 47 -- see Footnote 1) and handles upward of $133.6 BILLION DOLLARS in student loans debts.

    This might be an admirable or impressive feat but for the reality that most of the "business" associated with these student loans was obtained illegally.

    Keep in mind that the $133.6 BILLION DOLLARS number does not include side deals where Nelnet has aggressively marketed its KwikPay malware and injected it into supposedly "competing" loan service companies such as Edfinancial, Charter One Bank, First Mark Credit Services, etc.   How on Earth one company has been "entrusted" with so much student loan debt-handling is beyond comprehension.   

    The fundamental problem with KwikPay is exactly like this redditor mentioned -- that the portions of your payment getting applied to interest and principle are seemingly random, especially for borrowers with multiple kinds of "loans" bundled (aka "consolidated") under this one servicer.  

    This malware is programmed to apply interest vs. principle in a way that forces borrowers to maximize interest payments paid to the banks; this, of course, increases both the amount and the lifespan of the loan and makes paying it down that much harder.  The formula for even "simple" interest:  I = prt is easily manipulated when you let them play with the other variables in whatever manner they wish.

    Getting this straightened out is not only something they make difficult, but something that they actively discourage you from doing (or know how to do).

    Facts: 

    Some recent data about Nelnet from a recent earnings report:


    "Nelnet Reports Fourth Quarter 2014 Results -

    - Servicing $133.6 billion student loans for 5.9 million borrowers under government contract
    - 30 percent increase in payment processing revenue driven by RenWeb acquisition
    - Purchased $6.1 billion of loans during 2014"

    Historical Facts: 


    Nelnet was sued a few years ago under the False Claims Act. The details of this https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1oOP-5e5fiSWXdoaVgydTV5cnM/view?usp=sharing
    case were obtained through WikiLeaks, and links to the source documents have been included for convenience:

    The TL;DR version of a 285 page suit:

    As part of some incentive for "quick and dirty" regulation compliance, Nelnet was able to inject its malware into numerous Colleges, Universities, and alumni associations; students and graduates from over one hundred colleges and Universities (see list starting on page 14 or Footnote 2) ... were steered toward using Nelnet's exit counseling software -- software that was specifically designed to induce students into a transaction with Nelnet and JP Morgan / Citigroup for any FFELP consolidation loans.  Highlights from the case:
    • Nelnet made fraudulent and misleading statements on its website that consolidating the FFELP loans with Nelnet entitled them to a 6 month forebearance.
      • By conducing them to consolidate FFELP-eligible loans before their grace period runs out, and by offering them forbearance for which they are not entitled, Nelnet yields loans with higher interest payments and loan balances that extend for longer than they otherwise would. JP Morgan and Citigroup delight in this.
      • Nelnet failed to reveal that by consolidating, borrowers would lose certain rights the government grants on Perkins loans (lower interest rates, ability to discharge) 
    • JPMorgan and Citigroup were named as aiders and abettors to Nelnet for "knowingly assist[ing] in the improper acts, plans, schemes and transactions"
      •  There was a single plan for Nelnet, JP Morgan and Citigroup to obtain payment of US money by presenting as many FFELP claims as possible.  JP Morgan and Citigroup took advantage of this plan to obtain the maximum amount of US money, with overt wrongful acts
    • Nelnet agents were required to make 100+ telephone calls per day soliciting people to complete loan consolidations; they were specifically instructed to present misleading statements regarding eligibility and savings over the life of the loan.
      • However, the facts have shown that "individuals who consolidate their student loans with Nelnet end up paying more interest over the life of their loans and make payments for longer periods of time"

    Very sadly and quite unfortunately... Nelnet, JP Morgan and Citibank's attorneys + lobbyists were (and still are) very powerful.  They weaseled the judicial system to get this lawsuit thrown out (albeit from one man, not from anybody else who wishes to pursue it).   The bad guys got a small victory -- it was “settled” for a measly $55 million (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/13/nelnet-lawsuit-settled-st_n_681856.html), none of which went to distressed students who were taken by this scam.

    The original whistleblower – Rudy Vigil – had worked for Nelnet in the heyday of scamming students out of college – he ended up financially destitute and is reported to have filed bankruptcy. 

    Now, About RenWeb...


    So with that little whistleblower blip taken care of, and the asset of a formula that has been "proven" to work with little or no takedown by the government, Nelnet now sets its sights on target: RenWeb.

    RenWeb is a recent acquisition.  It at first appears to be an innocent and simple tool that can allow parents to track their childrens' school involvement; however, it is much more than that.  Pieces of RenWeb allow students to apply for tuition and financial assistance... and it gathers both performance and income-sensitive data, data that is surely very valuable for targeting likely defaulters.  Given Nelnet's historical actions, it's highly likely that this is an attempt to duplicate former success by getting the malware injection even sooner into the process -- by going after students' parents and a number of private or religious-based institutions.

    To Do:  

    The CFPB is soliciting borrowers’ complaints. The agency invites borrowers to submit complaints online or call a toll-free number: (855) 411-2372.

    Senator Elizabeth Warren is just about the only political person who can be counted on to stand up for the rights of student borrowers.  But if you know of any more, please mention them...

    Expect to see a lot of lawsuits on the horizon for Nelnet and its cronies.    





    KeyWords:  EdFinancial, Nelnet, Kwikpay, Student Loans, 5280 Solutions, Firstmark, Renweb


     Footnote 1:  Some of Nelnet Subsidaries (direct + indirect) are known as Education Solutions, Inc (Lincoln, NE); First National Life Insurance Company of the USA (Lincoln, NE); Lincoln Square Funding, LLC; Nelnet Student Asset Funding Extendible CP;  M &P Building LLC (Lincoln, NE); Peterson's Nelnet LLC (Lawrenceville, NJ); CUnet, LLC (Wyckhoff, NJ); Loanstar Assets Partners, LP (Delaware); Loanstar Assets GP (Delaware + Nebraska); Chela Education Funding, Inc. (NE); College Bound Loans, Inc. (Warwick, RI); National Honor Roll, L.L.C. (Lynbrook, NY); Student Marketing Group, Inc. (Lynbrook, NY);  FACTS Management (Lincoln, NE); infiNET Integrated Solutions (NE);  Shockley Financial Corp (Aurora, CO); SLAAA Acquisition Corp (Lincoln, NE);  Student Loan Acquisition Authority of Arizona, LLC (Delaware + Nebraska); National Education Loan of New England, Inc. (Warwick, RI); MELMAC, LLC (organized in Delaware - based in Portland, ME); MELMAC, Inc. (organzied in Nevada - Portland, ME); NHELP, Inc. (various states and cities); InTutition, Inc. (organized in Florida, based in Lincoln, NE); ClassCredit, Inc. (organized in Florida, based in Lincoln, NE), FirstMark Services, LLC (Woodbury, MN); 5280 Solutions (direct subsidiary Littleton, CO);  National Higher Loan Education Program, Inc (Lincoln, NE);  

    Footnote 2:  Schools targeted by Nelnet between 1998 - 2008:  Boise State University; Bowie State University; Central Michigan University; Cleary University; Clemson University; Cleveland State University; College of Charleston; Colorado State University; CC of Baltimore County; ECU; Eastern University; Washington University; Embry-Riddle; Emporia State U; Florida Coastal School of Law; Florida International University; Fort Hays State; Georgia College & State University; Georgia State U; Georgia Tech; Grand Canyon U; Hawaii Pacific U; Idaho State U; Indiana University; Iona College; James Madison University; The U of Kansas; Kansas State U; Langston University; Le Moyne College; Life University; Louisiana State University; Manhattan College; Medical University of OH; Miami University; Midland Lutheran College; North Carolina State; Northeastern State U; Northern Illinois U; Northern Kentucky U; Northern Michigan U; Northwestern State U; Norwich University; Ohio University; Oklahoma Christian University; Old Dominion University; Prescott College; Queens University of Charlotte; San Jose State U (SJSU); South Dakota State U (SDSU); Tarleton; Texas A&M; Texas Tech; Troy University; University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC); Union College; The University of Akron; U of Alaska - Fairbanks; U of Arizona; University of Central OK; U of Colorado; U of Dayton; U of Detroit-Mercury; University of Illinois; University of Kentucky; U of Louisiana; U of Missouri;  U of Maryland; The University of Memphis; University of Nevada; University of New England; University of New Mexico; University of North Florida; University of South Alabama; The University of South Dakota; University of South Florida; University of Toledo; University of Wisconsin; University of Nebraska at Kearney; University of New Orleans; Washburn; Wilkes University;   

    Footnote 3:   This author believes that you should never trust website software that uses ".aspx" in its URL bar.

    Footnote 4:  Malware is computer software that injects itself into a system and adds significant transactional burden and "load" to systems.  It does not go away on its own and must be forcefully removed.  

    Saturday, January 17, 2015

    Why I'm a boat rocker.

    "You're rocking the boat.  They don't like that."  

    A comment I heard just this week... one woman chatting with another woman about how she did it... how was she able to overcome the overwhelming gender bias in this industry and join a team with an employer who actually cares?

    How did she do it?  By not rocking the boat.

    I've had this ... I guess we could call it a "conversation" with myself at various points in my life.  Usually it's when I'm getting washed ashore and clinging to dear land, gasping for air:  Oh, geeze. I rocked the boat too hard, again!  And everybody, like, freaked out.  They threw me overboard!  How dare they!?  

    Why did they do that?  Because I rocked the boat.

    Yes, rather than risk their boat getting toppled by little me, they decided that the smartest thing to do is just throw the boat rocker overboard.  Gee thanks.  But the interesting thing is that never has any team member from any boat I've been thrown from stopped with pause to think or ask logical questions about things like physics or wind, materials science, currents or compass...

    Because all they can see is that their boat is getting rocked.   

    If only they could see... logical questions have logical answers.  It's not the boat rocker who ultimately destroys the boat and ruins everything; it's the boat rocker who exposes the vulnerabilities of the boat and can help everybody be more prepared.  Before it's too late.  But the key is that ... you've gotta let the boat rocker stay on the boat.  Having somebody who's not afraid to push the limits of our boat is a good thing. 

    The dearth of women and women in leadership roles in technology is obvious to anybody who has worked in technology.  Once in a while somebody will create a little movement ... some noise or a "non profit" or a summit or something.  But these blips are hardly ever noticed on the larger radar.  They fade and disappear.  People forget.  Men keep getting promoted over women, and they almost never have to fight quite as hard for the raises or pay they deserve.  Venture capitalists keep gladly seed-funding extras from The Social Network.   Firms from A...Z (pardon the pun) keep gladly throwing millions at startups which have been documented to willfully discriminate and retaliate against women.

    My two cents for the conversation is pretty simple:  there are only two different kinds of humans in the world:  Those who actively exploit women, and those who actively speak out against the exploitation of women.   Keeping your mouth shut for fear of rocking the boat -- this is a form of apathy all its own.  

    The exploiters have general strategies:  when she's smart, competent, hard working, and nice, underpay her.  She's easy to take advantage of.  Besides, when we really drill down and look at things, she just doesn't  deserve the same basis as the guys on her team.   Or better yet -- why allow her to be part of the company at all?  Why not make sure she's thoroughly plundered of her wages by a middleman "temp agency" or headhunter?  The more fear and job insecurity you can instill in her, the harder she'll try. 

    The other strategy the exploiters take is this:  when she's  smart, competent, hard working, and strong enough to stand up for herself, the exploitation takes the form of failure to hire, hiring with a longer "probation" period, bullying, biased performance reviews, or the ultimate insult of getting fired.

    I've tried both the "nice" and the "strong" approach, and the unfortunate reality is that neither one really works.   The number of people who actively exploit women is still too big, and the quantitative number of women who aren't afraid to rock the boats is still too small.

    But I'm not about to stop rocking boats.

    Because it's not the boat rocker who ultimately destroys a boat.  It's the boat rocker who exposes boats that simply do not possess enough integrity to handle the seas.  And those are boats I don't wanna be on anyway.

      Never did like any phone.  But I always trusted $Alphabet-C (GOOG.US)$ to keep the Internet alive on so-called "smart" phones. ...